{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/305956161"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "The second doctrine that prevented direct state regulation of imported wildlife prior to the Lacey Act arose from a series of judicial decisions strictly construing the Commerce Clause to preclude state control over virtually any item that traveled in interstate commerce. [FN75] In 1897, for example, the Supreme Court declared that because liquor was a lawful item of interstate commerce, states co" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "animallaw.info" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/491960199"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/305956161"] } } }
