{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/317555529"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "Although the Board of Appeal was entitled to conclude that there was no likelihood of confusion in respect of the goods covered by the earlier mark and interactive terminals for displaying and ordering goods and services and telecommunications systems and installations (the first and second types of goods), it had erroneously concluded that there was no likelihood of confusion so far as accessorie" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "blogspot.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/202267289"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/317555529" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/369560606"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/317555529" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/223445309"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/317555529" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/427984714"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/317555529"] } } }
