{ "items" : [
    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/380415837"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value" : [ "and -12 -678143.1 intended to produce the adverse action.??? Thus, the Court held that ???if a supervisor performs an act motivated by antimilitary animus that is intended by the supervisor to cause an adverse employment action, and if that act is a proximate cause of the ultimate employment action, then the employer is liable under USERRA.??? Justice Alito concurred, opining that an employer shou" ] ,
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom" : [ "jdsupra.com" ] } },

    { "id" : "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/467734969"
      "properties" : {
        "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ "http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/380415837"] } } }
