"Instead, it rejected plaintiff???s theory on two grounds: the antitrust laws did not require RIM to share its intellectual property (Op. at 9, citing SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 645 F.2d 1195, 1204 (2d Cir. 1982)); and RIM???s platform was not essential to plaintiff, there being a number of companies that manufactured smart phones, such as Samsung, Motorola and Nokia." . . . .