<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147435805>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<randalrauser.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/506980794>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147435805> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147435805>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147435805>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"The conclusion implies that (1) God isn???t needed to ground moral truths (contrary to such theists as William Lane Craig) and that (2) naturalism is false if it says that literally everything is a part of the natural world (rather than merely than no non-natural minds or causes exist)." .