<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147508512>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147508512>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<glazman.org> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/32333315>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147508512> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/509408400>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147508512> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/147508512>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"This sounds like the rant of a frustrated 10 years old kid (and I do not even know if the person who wrote the article is a woman or a man, old or young, westerner or not, I just do not care)...Describing software or algorithms as ???sexy???, ???hot???, etc.Some of my friends can testify I used to describe the beauty and the \"sexyness\" of some complex proofs in maths." .