<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/151306034>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/90920404>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/151306034> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/469649922>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/151306034> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/151306034>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<blogspot.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/151306034>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"Sure. and I have indicated that using the \"sin and evil argument is no argument, because there is no such thing as sin or evil -- they are moral constructs -- abstracts which reside only in the mind.When Sin and Evil arguments are used there is no more \"seeking the truth." .