<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/54633049>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/20051659> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/20051659>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<blogspot.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/385301945>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/20051659> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/20051659>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/20051659>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"Another question.When Aquinas writes that ???there is no reason to ask why He converts the former and not the latter??? (SCG 3.161.2), then is that because (a) there is no reason, or (b) there is a reason, but it is beyond our ability to know it." .