<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/298452892>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/320631468>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/298452892> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/298452892>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<rhrealitycheck.org> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/298452892>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"He assumes if you agree that life begins at conception you will accept all his other assumptions (fetal life = born life, all life is sacred, life trumps bodily autonomy, abortion is wrong, women are sinners, pancakes are the best breakfast, etc???) and that if you argue with one of his other assumptions in particular, you are also denying that life begins at conception." .