<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/36029730>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/307550220> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/307550220>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/307550220>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"That is what biology needs: more empiricism, less doctrinaire theorizing about origins.I don???t claim any expertise on the technical literature on junk DNA. Jonathan Wells, however, does keep up with the technical specialist literature on evolutionary theory, developmental biology, and other fields, and having made a special study of junk DNA, he is quite conversant with the entire history of the" .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/307550220>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<biologos.org> .