<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/318533641>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<whatswrongwiththeworld.net> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/301050088>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/318533641> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/318533641>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/318533641>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"--Is it your position that all natural objects point with equal _evidential_ and _epistemic_ force to God and that there is something deeply wrong about holding that some natural objects--biological objects, say--provide a special kind of evidence for the existence of God that other natural objects--such as a rock, if a rock is a natural object on your view--do not provide?" .