<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/376949741>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/376949741>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<bbc.co.uk> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/381075786>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/376949741> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/484501418>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/376949741> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/376949741>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"I refer to things like analysis of US military intervention rather than just material like the restoration of Hitler's sea defences as you mention.Regardless, I think the magazine is a great idea and the layout is good (despite all the comments to the contrary above!) it is worth remembering for those commentators that BBC outside the UK is considered a world news provider rather than simply a UK-c" .