<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/131862977>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/401116314> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/401116314>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<scienceblogs.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/401116314>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/401116314>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"I have nothing further to say on this topic except to repeat that M & J are an irrelevance, that they are not proxies for ???climate science??? as a whole, (a dishonest framing), that the tree is not poisoned, (more dishonest framing) and that the sceptics have no scientific case." .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/131121975>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/401116314> .