<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/478974734>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/4029744> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/253381629>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/4029744> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/4029744>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<ncbar.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/4029744>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/4029744>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"According to our ethics opinions, if a former employee was privy to privileged communications with the company???s lawyer as to the strategy and objectives of the representation, the management of the case, or other matters pertinent to the representation, the former employee is off-limits and consent of the represented organization???s counsel is required. 97 FEO 2." .