<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/421614705>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<slashdot.org> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/421614705>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/490649520>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/421614705> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/405541946>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/421614705> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/421614705>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"Its amazing what they are allowing, simple google searches would reveal the patent is a copy and yet, seemingly totally legal." .