<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/338813242>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/435163767> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/185137358>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/435163767> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/435163767>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<sciblogs.co.nz> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/435163767>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/435163767>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"Now it seems that the case appears to have sparked somethng of a backlash in the UK, with chiropractors advised by their professional body to remove from their websites & other publicity material any claims of the ability to treat conditions such as whiplash and colic." .