<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/83198157>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/83198157>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<mysql.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/83198157>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"But conversely, there are cases when MySQL rises above SQL Server in some ways, such as partitioning ??? SQL Server does have parallel support for partitioning, but MySQL provides more options for various types of partitioning: MySQL offers range, hash, key, list, and composite partitioning whereas SQL Server only offers range." .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/395124009>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/83198157> .