<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/93052447>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/258723357>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/93052447> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/93052447>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom>	<blogspot.com> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/42579411>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/93052447> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/93052447>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value>	"it is clear from the start that the bill should never have been on the agenda and the Council broke it is own Rule 18 which states:-18- No resolution or ordinance approving or authorizing the execution of any contract, lease, agreement or other instrument, or authorizing the closure and/or abandonment of any street, alley or easement, upon being filed, shall" .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/400494056>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/93052447> .
<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/prov/42069026>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom>	<http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/93052447> .