at he has had to prove so much to so many doubters for 12 months now that no matter what he does, i.e. change his game, win a masters, make finals of AO, win FO, win wimby and go on to defend the USO, if rafa does not make that final, then roger is always going to be at a disadvantage with those rafa fans out there who say that, 'roger only won because rafa wasn't there'. does that make sense?