I usually advocate a 'free society' in terms of something like that (think also of Nozick's book part 3: utopia, with all the different communities and 'their' vision of 'the good'.) Even if one thinks one can have positive obligation towards a political group or community, that does not (imo) entail the 'state' as such, i.e. an organization with very high opt out costs, that (sort of) monopolizes