July 30, 2009). 9 Id. 10 497 F.3d 1360, 1369 (emphasis added). 11 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 n.5. 12 See 497 F.3d 1360, 1385 (Newman, J.) (concurring) (???It cannot be the court???s intention to tolerate the intentional disregard or destruction of the value of the property of another, simply because that property is a patent . . .