Where there is such extrinsic evidence, the meaning of the ambiguous contract is a question of fact for the factfinder.??? (citations omitted)); Creech v. Melnik, 495 S.E.2d 907, 913 (N.C. 1998) (???[S]ummary judgment is particularly inappropriate where issues such as motive, intent, and other subjective feelings and reactions are material and where the evidence is subject to conflicting interpret